Derek,

I'm interested in why "lines" create difficulties (of acceptance) for you. What do you think *maps* which you seem to have no problem accepting, are made of ... but lines? What do you think image schemas, on which cognitive embodied science is founded, are made of ... but lines?

The key difficulty here is that you seem to be still thinking of *computer programs* - rather than robots. I take it for granted that the only real AGI will be a robot, and, in that case I suggest - but by all means object - that a robot that directs its own thoughts and actions - and is directed from outside by others - by means of lines (goal-directed lines) is not at all hard to accept.

It is arguable - and is argued by many linguists - that language began and begins with signs/sign language - people pointing each other along certain lines - to look, move and act along certain lines. Even one of Ben's demos is based on lines - a dog being pointed to a ball - though it wasn't properly instantiated.

The larger problem is that our whole culture treats language as if it were purely a means of *depicting* the world - a set of *pictures*. Actually, it is primarily a system of guiding actions. But culturally we haven't realised this yet. So I don't think you and others are attuned to seeing AGI - and the "language" of an AGI - as centrally about guiding action.

I accept that a good illustration of how an "outline" language will work with a robot is needed to make all this clear to you and others - and I have one - but again it requires a good deal of time & space to set out.

-----Original Message----- From: Derek Zahn
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 12:42 AM
To: AGI
Subject: RE: [agi] The many different types of embodiment


Mike Tintner wrote:

We are continually following (and imposing) lines of action and thought.
It's hardly a big stretch to see those lines as represented in the brain -
there to guide the planning of our movements and thoughts.

It is a big stretch, to me. You apply the word "line" in all sorts of creative and metaphorical ways to various activities, which is fine for us -- that is how humans think -- but the challenge of AGI is figuring out how to get computers to do those things. It doesn't do any good to suggest mechanisms that require general intelligence just to use...

And besides it is far from clear to me that implementing an artificial intelligence using some literal sense of "lines" is necessary or even a good idea. To be convincing you have to at least give some indication about how a computer program would go about doing it.

but presumably, animals - and any AGI robot - must have some internal
equivalent, however crude, of our external maps

Certainly! This is much more sensible. Brains do in fact have at least one extensive and complicated mapping system (google "place cells" for more info, and I think the various native coordinate systems used in the brain could possibly be put to similar generative use). My personal tentative belief is that at least some of the "basic" concepts underlying our conceptual system -- image schemas and other foundational general/powerful things -- are laboriously abstracted in early childhood from these hardwired special-purpose brain circuits (possibly some have, in a rudimentary way, been "compiled" into the genome to make that easier). Another example could involve abstracting the so-called "object file" which our brains use to keep track of important objects in our environment... perhaps the whole "object" concept starts from there... I don't know how this would work (yet)... Jean Matter Mandler has a theory she calls Perceptual Meaning Analysis which looks promising and is pretty close -- but too vague for engineering use.

Derek Zahn



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-59a2eca5
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to