Wasn’t saying it’s new – just that it would be nice to have some comments on it and related disciplines – and for people to stop even considering “developmental AI” (vs robotics) as a possibility rather than a totally outdated impossible fantasy.
From: Piaget Modeler Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:36 AM To: AGI Subject: RE: [agi] The many different types of embodiment What is new about developmental robotics (or developmental AI) for that matter? Nothing new there. To me it is the goal. ~PM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [agi] The many different types of embodiment > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:37:52 +0000 > > Doesn't sound any clearer. > > How about following developmental robotics rather than evo devo universe? > That seems to be the field inspiring a lot of European research. > > http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~rakison/meedenconnsci06.pdf > http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2011/03/developmental-robotics-the-cute-baby-robot-who-will-grow-up-to-be-just-like-you.html > http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~rakison/meedenconnsci06.pdf > > I esp. liked the premise of the above paper: > > "we shall eliminate direct programming from consideration; it is still the > most effective method for solving a particular task quickly, but seems > unlikely ever to lead to > open-ended, general-purpose behaviour" > > Any comments on this and related fields? Epigenetic robotics et al? > AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
