One of the problems I have had with the theories that are discussed in AI/AGI discussions, is that they do not seem to answer the most basic of questions. They never seem to be clearly related to the way we actually think. There are explanations for this. First of all computer programming is not the same as our personal experiences of thinking. This leads to some fracturing of the principles of thought. Secondly, most of us have a sense that we have to understand the underlying form-of-thought in order to understand how thought might take place. And this is probably true. Jim Bromer
------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
