> > And a true AGI-er [I now realise] MUST do his own extended > research/introspection into his own thinking. He MUST understand from > personal experience/knowledge that *thinking* represents a whole different > and higher level of “information management* in counterpoint to algos which > are low-level automatic “information processing”. > > Had you done any extended introspection you would be at least ready to > realise this. >
Truly, I have done extended introspection, and come to very different conclusions than you.... Many other cog sci researchers have also done extended introspection and come to different conclusions than you... I think you have a very limited conception of an "algorithm" ... > > P.S. You may remember I gave you a beautiful opportunity to introspect > about quasi-mathematical thinking some years ago - - “look at how I [or > you] draw a doodle” [as recorded step-by-step on the GE IMagination Cubed > site] – “how can that be algorithmic [or computationally] determined?” - > you declined that introspective opportunity. You always do. > > > I'm not much of a visual artist, but I've spent many hundreds of hours introspecting into the thought processes underlying improvising music.... Maybe I'll find time to write those introspections up one day ;) ... but at the moment it doesn't seem the most productive use of my time... -- Ben G ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
