Trolling aside, and who can resist a little trolling here and there since our global village lacks not its global village idiots, constructive criticism takes at least two counterparts, and one cannot pretend to be shocked that such a meeting of minds only takes place a few times a year, after all this channel is too noisy for most people. Certainly your ruminations don't fit very well in a professional AGIer's universe, and I would only call myself a semi-pro at this stage, so quite a few of us thought ok, get on with it and maybe we will find something to sink our teeth into later on. I think we've all agreed to disagree in our intuitions, given the complexity of the problem it would be natural if only one of us found the right checks and balances, perhaps by genius or sheer luck, but that kind of has to wait for the proof of the pudding. Again, as far as I am concerned, we share a lot of concerns, for AIXI for example, while we can't see eye to eye on others. Only way out: work on that freaking pudding! Simple learning, statistics transcending, show me the money!
AT On 29.07.2013, at 02:07, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: > One of the interesting but disappointing things about groups like this is > that there is pretty serious lack of insightful criticism and comment. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
