I hope to help evolve the dialog here as I feel that issues that Ben and I share interests in can be vetted within this discussion. I must acknowledge that I do not read interspersed text as a rule simply because it is so hard to take the time to figure out the two sides and the intended meaning (at least for me).
I hope that we might make full statements as communications, that have some independence from previous messages even if we do quote properly from previous messages. Pei, My approach is to rely on human cognitive acuity more by providing the proper agility in the design and deployment of the often half baked AI technology that the user community has so far been exposed to. When looking at biological models of vision (for example the work of J. J. Gibson) one develops a notion that motion is in fact very important to how object recognition. Ecological psychology (Robert Shaw and Michael Turvey) develops from this recognition of the relevance of motion to object consistency. Motion and the reasons why motion is used in developing recognition of objects is only one issues that is informed by a true knowledge of biological intelligence. Artificial General Intelligence may be targeting the development of a means for processing data into information and information into machine ontology. How can we join a colleague David Noziglia into this discussion? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/