> Qualia by their definition (ineffable, non-causal etc.) have no
> function, can
> have no function in the system, that I do agree with Dennett ('quining
> qualia'). I also agree with Dennett that if the behaviour of a system is
> completely explained nothing remains, all extra ontology is just
> redundant
> metaphysics. Eliminate it by Ockham's razor; like William James
> said: 'every
> difference must make a difference.'Hmmmm.... One modification to this: Even if all the behavior of a system is completely explained by ideas in set X, there may still be a value for ideas in set Y if they give a *simpler* explanation of the behavior of a system. This is not just a quibble, it's a relevant issue. Even if mechanisms give a complete explanation of a system's behavior, qualia could still be relevant if they give a simpler explanation of aspects of the system's behavior. Which *does* appear to be the case... -- Ben G ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
