YKY, this kind of thing has been tried many dozens of times in the
history of AI.

It does not lead to interesting results!  Alas...

The key problem is that you can't feasibly encode enough facts to
allow interesting commonsense inferences -- commonsense inference
seems to require a very massive store of highly uncertain
knowledge-items, rather than a small store of certain ones.

BTW the rule

"if X is-a Y and Z(Y), then Z(X)".

exists (in a slightly different form) in Novamente and many other
inference systems...

I feel like you are personally rediscovering GOFAI, the kind of AI
that I read about in textbooks when I first started exploring the
field in the early 1980's!!!!

Ben G

Thanks for the tips.  My idea is quite simple, slightly innovative, but not
groundbreaking.  Basically, I want to collect a knowledgebase of facts as
well as rules.  Facts are like "water is wet" etc.  The rules I explain
with this example:  "Cats have claws;  Kitty is a cat;  therefore Kitty has
claws."  Here is an implicit rule that says "if X is-a Y and Z(Y), then
Z(X)".  I call rules like this the "Rules of Thought".  They are not logical
tautologies but they express some common thought patterns.

My theory is that if we collect a bunch of these rules, add a database
of common sense facts, and add a rule-based FOPL inference engine (which may
be enhanced with eg Pei Wang's numerical logic), then we have a common sense
reasoner.  That's what I'm trying to build as a first-stage AGI.

If it does work, there may be some commercial applications for such a
reasoner.  Also it would serve as the base to build a full AGI capable of
machine learning etc (I have crudely worked out the long-term plan).

So, is this a good business idea?

YKY ________________________________
 This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email

To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303

Reply via email to