Derek, My suggestion would be: If the individual's goal (the section #1 on my list) is to develop AGI then I would say yes. Filling all sections would be optional. If the goal is just to support AGI by developing [possibly narrow AI] components useful for AGI then no (could be somehow listed separately).
Regards, Jiri Jelinek On Nov 7, 2007 10:38 AM, Derek Zahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A large number of individuals on this list are "architecting" an AGI > solution (or part of one) in their spare time. I think that most of those > efforts do not have meaningful answers to many of the questions, but rather > intend to address AGI questions from a particular perspective. Would such > people be encouraged to fill this out, even though they might only answer a > couple of the numbered points? > > Probably most people like that are not "serious contenders" in the sense of > having a complete detailed plan for achieving a full AGI. Rather they think > a particular aspect or approach is not being given enough attention and hope > to explore part of it to see if their ideas merit further development. > > I could see wanting to include or exclude such amateur efforts, depending > on the goals of this database. Perhaps a separate section would be a good > idea for such people to provide a brief unstructured summary of their > interests and ideas. > > > > ________________________________ > > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&; ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=62447199-5429ee
