Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
I don't really understand what you mean by "programmed" ... nor by "creative"
You say that, according to your definitions, a GA is programmed and
ergo cannot be creative...
How about, for instance, a computer simulation of a human brain? That
would be operated via program code, hence it would be "programmed" --
so would you consider it intrinsically noncreative?
Could you please define your terms more clearly?
thx
ben
Creativity is a byproduct of analogical reasoning, or abstraction. It
has nothing to do with symbols or genetic algorithms! GA is too
computationally complex to generate "creative" solutions.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=82421095-927e7e
