>> Do you really think a purely verbal processor can stay with all that?

Yes, Mike.  A number of us believe exactly that.  The fact that you don't have 
the knowledge or experience to see how it might be possible is not equivalent 
to an argument that it is not possible.

Further, you keep bringing up your guesses and uninformed *opinions* like "And 
I think that actually IS how language and the brain works. It's basically a 
movie editor. " and insisting on treating them as if they are scientific fact 
despite ample scientific evidence to the contrary.


----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mike Tintner 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:01 AM
  Subject: Re: [agi] Why Symbolic Representation P.S.




    Stephen,

    Fighting comeback :).  But then how do you get from "hell" etc to people 
patting him etc to his walking achingly to a dressing-room to discarding bits 
of "apparatus" to "a tie-up" to "clamping down on a water bottle" to " A camera 
zooming in.." to  him looking like a movie character (& why, if you've seen the 
movie, will you & I probably remember the same shot, that we've never heard 
talked about), to understanding what "a replay showing on his face etc.." means?

    It is an awesomely difficult passage if you're trying to process it. And 
the reason I'm dwelling on it, is because it's so fascinating - it actually 
barely illustrates my particular, earlier point re movement trajectories 
(though that is still valid).

    If you really want to understand how language works - that's a movie scene, 
with changing shots and POV's, being put together from, in some cases, purely 
visual, movie sequences in memory (including The Long Good Friday final scene). 
And I think that actually IS how language and the brain works. It's basically a 
movie editor. (Even when you think you're doing nothing else but looking at a 
symbolic equation, "2 + 2 =4" it's still being projected on the movie screen of 
your consciousness, as Damasio insists).

    The syntax of those sentences is the same syntax that binds this sequence 
together:

    http://faculty.cua.edu/johnsong/hitchcock/pages/stills-NxNW/UN3.html

    And it's the same syntax that will probably allow your brain to understand 
a set of non-sentences like:

    "Morning.  Frozen breath. Train. Boring Mondays. Crowds surging. Doors 
clattering. Sitting down. Newspapers rustling."

    Do you really think a purely verbal processor can stay with all that?



    Hi Mike,


    "John Arne Riise stood doubled over in his tiny corner of football hell."


    These sentences are great demonstrations of why I favor a construction 
grammar.   It's not necessary to process the imagery from first principles.  
These sentences are full of idioms that can be simply treated as constructions 
(i.e. form <--> meaning pairs).

      a.. doubled over -- from WordNet: bent over or curled up, usually with 
laughter or pain 
      b.. corner of X hell -- a very uncomfortable situation involving X 
      c.. tiny corner of X hell -- very uncomfortable situation involving X in 
which the agent (i.e. John Arne Riise) does not share the situation with anyone 
else
    ...and so forth for the rest of the passage.  The downside of construction 
grammar is lots of constructions.  But human children learn them, by being 
taught and by observation / induction , so I think a dialog system can too.

    This sort of text by the way, long ago put an end to the Cyc Project's then 
ambition to read and comprehend an article in a newspaper.  Texai may fail 
also, but certainly not in the same way Cyc did.


    -Steve


    Stephen L. Reed


    Artificial Intelligence Researcher
    http://texai.org/blog
    http://texai.org
    3008 Oak Crest Ave.
    Austin, Texas, USA 78704
    512.791.7860 



    ----- Original Message ----
    From: Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    To: [email protected]
    Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 8:07:13 PM
    Subject: Re: [agi] Why Symbolic Representation P.S.

    Abram,

    Just to illustrate further, here's the opening lines of today's Times 
sports 
    report on a football match.[Liverpool v Chelsea] How on earth could this be 
    understood without massive imaginative simulation? [Stephen?] And without 
    mainly imaginative memories of football matches?

    "John Arne Riise stood doubled over in his tiny corner of football hell. 
    Agony engulfed him. One by one, teammates offered a pat on the back, a 
    handshake, or just a touch, some form of human contact to show they cared. 
    None of it did much good. He walked, step by aching step, to the sanctuary 
    of the dressing-room, discarding bits of the apparatus of the professional 
    footballer as he went. A tie-up here, a shin pad there.

    He clamped down on his water bottle and held it between his teeth, like a 
    bit to stop him gnawing through his bottom lip. A camera zoomed in to show 
    muscles around his eyes and mouth tensing as his mind worked overtime. He 
    looked like Harold Shand being driven to his execution in the final scenes 
    of The Long Good Friday. A replay of every mistake he had made to get there 
    was showing on his face." 


    -------------------------------------------
    agi
    Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
    RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
    Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
    Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it 
now. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          agi | Archives  | Modify Your Subscription   



----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG. 
    Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.3/1393 - Release Date: 4/23/2008 
8:12 AM


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        agi | Archives  | Modify Your Subscription  

-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to