On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Dr. Matthias Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think, your argumentation is that an AGI system (e.g. human being) can > solve any halting problem because it can change > over time by making more and more experiences. But the even the "experience > making" human being can be regarded as a turing machine with a fixed and > finite algorithm.
It's pretty bald to expect that many people could've been missing such a flaw in your straw man for years, isn't it? -- Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
