Hey Richard,

   You and I seem to have stalled out on the complexity question . . . .

I don't mean to be difficult but I'm still not sure that I'm getting the point . . . . so let me try to recap what I think you're saying . . . .

Question 1.

Richard > The purpose of the argument
Richard > My purpose is to explain that if the task of building an artificial intelligence involves trying to engineer a "complex system", then we are in big trouble because all the methods currently used by AI researchers depend on the fact that intelligent systems are not complex systems.

OK. I have no problem with saying that most methods used depend upon the fact that intelligent systems are not complex and that that is a problem.

Richard > When is a system complex?
Richard > When trying to decide if a given system is complex, it is important to be clear about some of the distinctions I made in the definition of complexity (yesterday's post). Richard > First, the strict definition of a complex system is that it has some observable behavior that can only be explained by a theory that is too large for us to discover (and possibly there is no explanation at all, except for simulating the entire system). So the most basic criterion for complexity is the size of the theory that "explains" the system's behavior.

I have a couple of problems here. First, your strict definition is not the definition that I am accustomed to. I would be willing to accept your definition *EXCEPT* that you repeatedly refer to systems that do not meet your definition as complex. For example, the theory of gravity is *VERY* simple. The theory perfectly explains observable behavior if you have the necessary computing power and accuracy of initial measurements. Yet, you insist that "if you consider the general case of an n-body system then it is fully and completely complex." You did leave yourself an odd out by including the phrase "except for simulating the entire system" BUT since the theory of gravitation is THE correct explanation for an n-body system I don't see why you believe you can maintain this definition and also claim that an n-body system is complex.


-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to