Which actual world, a natural or manmade? And if there is plenty of expensive electronic memory for all the nodes in that rather large graph. It's a feat of efficiency management to trim it down as much as you can in order for it to have a chance of developing a subset of that rich understanding.
I just assume, might be wrong, that there is a lot of excess mass, vestigial or idle, for coping with various environments. Comparing a brain to an engineered AGI solution. John From: Derek Zahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 3:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [agi] Pattern extrapolation as a method requiring limited intelligence John Rose writes: > So I feel that much of our brain mass is there due to the natural richness > of nature, and there may be quite a bit of overkill compared to what would > be needed in software AGI. Are we satisfied building AGIs that cannot cope with the actual world because it is too rich? Personally I think that without the "natural richness of nature", our intelligence would never develop. We climb those levels of richness like a rock face. _____ agi | <http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> Archives <http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/> | <http://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Modify Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
