We can assume that the speaking human itself is not aware about every
details of its patterns. At least these details would be probably hidden
from communication.
Absolutely. We are not aware of most of our assumptions that are based in
our common heritage, culture, and embodiment. But an external observer
could easily notice them and tease out an awful lot of information about us
by doing so.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Matthias Heger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 3:18 PM
Subject: AW: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI]
We can assume that the speaking human itself is not aware about every
details of its patterns. At least these details would be probably hidden
from communication.
-Matthias
Mark Waser wrote
Details that don't need to be transferred are those which are either known
by or unnecessary to the recipient. The former is a guess (unless the
details were transmitted previously) and the latter is an assumption based
upon partial knowledge of the recipient. In a perfect, infinite world,
details could and should always be transferred. In the real world, time
and
computational constraints means that trade-offs need to occur. This is
where the essence of intelligence comes into play -- determining which of
the trade-offs to take to get optimal perfomance (a.k.a. domain
competence)
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
