I have given the example with the dog next to a tree.
There is an ambiguity. It can be resolved because the pattern for dog has
a
stronger relation to the pattern for angry than it is the case for the
pattern of tree.
So, are the relationships between the various patterns in your translation
module or in your cognitive module?
I would argue that they are in your cognitive module. If you disagree, then
I'll just agree to disagree because in order for them to be in your
translation module then you'll have to be constantly updating your
translation module which then contradicts what you said previously about the
translation module being static.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Matthias Heger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 5:38 PM
Subject: AW: [agi] Words vs Concepts [ex Defining AGI]
I have given the example with the dog next to a tree.
There is an ambiguity. It can be resolved because the pattern for dog has
a
stronger relation to the pattern for angry than it is the case for the
pattern of tree.
You don't have to manipulate any patterns and can do the translation.
- Matthias
Marc Walser wrote:
How do you communicate something for which you have no established
communications protocol? If you can answer that, you have solved the
natural language problem.
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
