I have given the example with the dog next to a tree. There is an ambiguity. It can be resolved because the pattern for dog has a stronger relation to the pattern for angry than it is the case for the pattern of tree.
You don't have to manipulate any patterns and can do the translation. - Matthias Marc Walser wrote: How do you communicate something for which you have no established communications protocol? If you can answer that, you have solved the natural language problem. ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
