On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I agree to is NOT to hold opinion (which I may or may not agree with at > any particular time), but I agree TO THE ACT OF SENDING THE MESSAGE. I agree > that someone else can deliver a specific and particular legal statement on > behalf of myself as a panelist. Such an agreement is a legal entity. The > message I agree to is the WHOLE message, not just the judgement part of it... > if someone agrees to post a message on my behalf, then deletes part of the > message, you'd better believe it's breaking the agreement! And you'd better > believe I expect R101 protections (e.g. silence=refusal). The text in R2157 > is pretty clear that it's message-sending that is being agreed to, and this > message sending has a clear legal status.
R101 protections are unnecessary here. If another panel member sends a message that you did not agree to, then it was not successfully sent on behalf of the panel. -root
