On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > R101 protections are unnecessary here. If another panel member sends > a message that you did not agree to, then it was not successfully sent > on behalf of the panel.
Sorry about repeating myself, but R101 is all about burden of proof. If two members disagree on what was agreed to, or if one member claims agreement and the other isn't present, the judge should judge on the preponderance of evidence of course, but err on the side of no agreement having been given. That's all I was trying to say by bringing up R101 in the first place. -Goethe
