On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Sean Hunt wrote: > > > Transfer Zombie G. to Fool, amend its text to "I perform the LEGAL > > actions specified by the casher in the cashing message. I create a > > promise identical to this one and transfer it to the casher.", and set > > its expiry to the epoch. > > This suddenly made me realize that the author destruction condition in the > original promise (and many of the other Zombie promises) is almost entirely > useless, since the casher can simply use the promise to create a new > indestrucible promise.
Yep. It at least one situation, this was anticipated in terms of private arrangements (by handshake not anything necessarily enforceable). I also wondered if that fell under r101 ( eg, you can sign your ability to do actions, but if in doing so you get committed to further actions that amount to a change in the original conditions, that's either new agreement w/o consent or change to old agreement w/o review).
