On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > Both this batch of proposals and the recent ones show that the cost > of proposals is absolutely no barrier, therefore it serves no purpose > other than a busywork hassle. The cost should either be a significant > barrier, or no cost, current system is a pointless compromise.
Many are disinterested, which is a problem for controls (hence the new language expressly limiting disinterested proposals), and I disagree with the notion that cost should be significant. I like this system in principle in that it limits proposals to either trivial (disinterested) ones or the ones that people are willing to pay to have distributed. -scshunt
