On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Charles Walker wrote: > On 24 Aug 2013 21:21, "Kerim Aydin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Both this batch of proposals and the recent ones show that the cost > > of proposals is absolutely no barrier, therefore it serves no purpose > > other than a busywork hassle. The cost should either be a significant > > barrier, or no cost, current system is a pointless compromise. > > > > The other problem is that the cost is trivial to avoid. Should have been more specific: trivial avoidance is of course part of the issue. A past version was that the only way a proposal could be free was w/o objection (and common practice at the time was to object to anything being free unless it was grammar/simple bug fix). -G.
- DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Charles Walker
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Sean Hunt
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Charles Walker
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Sean Hunt
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of refor... omd
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of ... Ørjan Johansen
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of refor... Charles Walker
- DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Charles Walker
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Sean Hunt
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of refor... Charles Walker
- DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Kerim Aydin
- DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Ørjan Johansen
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A major series of reforms. Kerim Aydin

