On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 24 Aug 2013 21:21, "Kerim Aydin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Both this batch of proposals and the recent ones show that the cost
> > of proposals is absolutely no barrier, therefore it serves no purpose
> > other than a busywork hassle.  The cost should either be a significant
> > barrier, or no cost, current system is a pointless compromise.
> >
> 
> The other problem is that the cost is trivial to avoid.

Should have been more specific: trivial avoidance is of course part of
the issue.

A past version was that the only way a proposal could be free was w/o
objection (and common practice at the time was to object to anything
being free unless it was grammar/simple bug fix).

-G.


Reply via email to