On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Should have been more specific: trivial avoidance is of course part of > the issue. > > A past version was that the only way a proposal could be free was w/o > objection (and common practice at the time was to object to anything > being free unless it was grammar/simple bug fix). > > -G.
I'm more than okay with reimplementing this. -scshunt
