On Friday, March 8, 2019 2:50 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
> You don't have to worry about the Disclaimer in the ADoP's report -
> disclaimers are used all the time to ratify false things, under the guidance
> of R2202 you're supposed to use disclaimers when reporting false things
> for the purpose of ratification, and this explicitly does not stop
> ratification.

Yeah, I agree, and the disclaimer is disclaiming something else anyway. I just 
thought I should mention it, since it seems like the sort of thing someone 
might try to use to cast doubt on the judgement. :P

> Proposal 8164 will not undo the self-ratification. It will retroactively
> determine that the ADoP's Report was wrong in a different way, but the
> report will have still have self-ratified as it was written.

Yes, exactly. So the SPOOKY distribution failed either way, and there is no 
paradox (and will not be even when P8164 is adopted normally).


Reply via email to