On 7/22/19 6:39 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
On Monday, July 22, 2019 9:02 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
I confirm (in public here) that there is a contract with at least 2
parties, known as NSC.
Can you point out in which message(s) - which, per Rule 2519, must be public -
the parties consented to the agreement, thereby causing it to become a contract?
-twg
Ehh... not quite.
Rule 1742 ("Contracts") reads:
For the purposes of this rule, agreement includes both consent and agreement
specified by contract.
The contract could have specified other ways to agree to it, besides
public consent.
--
Jason Cobb
