> > This is great! but I'm likely to vote AGAINST unless we get a > > crime/infraction distinction and this becomes an infraction, i.e. not > > actually against the rules. > > Is this something that is currently being proposed, or no? I know > there's something related to blots and stuff in the proposal pool > currently, but I don't remember what it actually does. If not, I could > probably add some form of that to the proposal.
No, G. sketched an idea in the thread "Rule Violation Options" but it hasn't been turned into a proposal yet. The idea is that actions defined as "crimes" are rule violations but actions described as "infractions" aren't, but still incur penalties. - Falsifian
