amber-spec-experts  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Clarifying record reflective support Brian Goetz
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support Alex Buckley
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support Remi Forax
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support forax
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support forax
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support Brian Goetz
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support forax
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support Brian Goetz
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support John Rose
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support forax
  • Re: Clarifying record reflective support Chris Hegarty
• Pattern variable and field shadowing Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Pattern variable and field shadowing Brian Goetz
  • Re: Pattern variable and field shadowing Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Pattern variable and field shadowing Remi Forax
  • Re: Pattern variable and field shadowing Gavin Bierman
• Pattern instanceof Variable JEP clarification Manoj Palat
  • Re: Pattern instanceof Variable JEP clarification Brian Goetz
• Evolution of records spec Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Evolution of records spec Remi Forax
  • Re: Evolution of records spec Brian Goetz
• Spec: ACC_MANDATED Leonid Kuskov
  • Re: Spec: ACC_MANDATED Alex Buckley
  • Re: Spec: ACC_MANDATED Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: Spec: ACC_MANDATED Alex Buckley
  • Re: Spec: ACC_MANDATED Brian Goetz
  • Re: Spec: ACC_MANDATED Dan Smith
  • Re: Spec: ACC_MANDATED Alex Buckley
  • Re: Spec: ACC_MANDATED Leonid Kuskov
• final fields in record Remi Forax
  • Re: final fields in record Brian Goetz
  • Re: final fields in record forax
  • Re: final fields in record John Rose
• Record attribut should allow Deprecate atribute on record component Remi Forax
• Record canonical constructor is required to be public Remi Forax
  • Re: Record canonical constructor is required to be public Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Record canonical constructor is required to be public forax
  • Re: Record canonical constructor is required to be public John Rose
  • Re: Record canonical constructor is required to be public Brian Goetz
  • Re: Record canonical constructor is required to be public John Rose
  • Re: Record canonical constructor is required to be public forax
• [records] Non-compact canonical constructors Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [records] Non-compact canonical constructors Brian Goetz
  • Re: [records] Non-compact canonical constructors Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [records] Non-compact canonical constructors Alex Buckley
  • Re: [records] Non-compact canonical constructors Gavin Bierman
• [records] Compact constructor type parameters Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [records] Compact constructor type parameters Brian Goetz
  • Re: [records] Compact constructor type parameters Gavin Bierman
• Reminder about draft specs Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Reminder about draft specs Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Reminder about draft specs John Rose
  • Re: Reminder about draft specs Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Reminder about draft specs Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Reminder about draft specs Gavin Bierman
• question about java.lang.reflect.RecordComponent API Vicente Romero
  • Re: question about java.lang.reflect.RecordComponent API Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: question about java.lang.reflect.RecordComponent API Vicente Romero
• forbidding serialization methods as members of records Vicente Romero
  • Re: forbidding serialization methods as members of records Chris Hegarty
  • Re: forbidding serialization methods as members of records Remi Forax
  • Re: forbidding serialization methods as members of records Vicente Romero
  • Re: forbidding serialization methods as members of records forax
  • Re: forbidding serialization methods as members of records Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: forbidding serialization methods as members of records Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: forbidding serialization methods as members of records Brian Goetz
  • Re: forbidding serialization methods as members of records Joe Darcy
• Text blok follow up Remi Forax
  • Re: Text blok follow up Brian Goetz
  • Re: Text blok follow up Remi Forax
  • Re: Text blok follow up Brian Goetz
  • Re: Text blok follow up Remi Forax
• [sealed] Sealed interface as a utility class? Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed interface as a utility class? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed interface as a utility class? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed interface as a utility class? Remi Forax
• Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - update Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - update Peter Levart
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - update Chris Hegarty
• Record attribute binary format Remi Forax
  • Re: Record attribute binary format Brian Goetz
  • Re: Record attribute binary format forax
  • Re: Record attribute binary format Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Record attribute binary format Vicente Romero
  • Re: Record attribute binary format Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Record attribute binary format forax
  • Re: Record attribute binary format Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Record attribute binary format Vicente Romero
• sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Brian Goetz
  • Re: sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Chris Hegarty
  • Re: sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Brian Goetz
  • Re: sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Remi Forax
  • Re: sample javadoc output for records and sealed types. Jonathan Gibbons
• Re: Class.getRecordComponent() javadoc doesn't specify its behavior if the accessor of a record component is not present Remi Forax
• Fields and methods of a record are marked MANDATED Remi Forax
  • Re: Fields and methods of a record are marked MANDATED Brian Goetz
  • Re: Fields and methods of a record are marked MANDATED Joe Darcy
  • Re: Fields and methods of a record are marked MANDATED Brian Goetz
  • Re: Fields and methods of a record are marked MANDATED Alex Buckley
  • Re: Fields and methods of a record are marked MANDATED Remi Forax
  • Re: Fields and methods of a record are marked MANDATED Joe Darcy
  • Re: Fields and methods of a record are marked MANDATED Jonathan Gibbons
• PatternHandle in record Remi Forax
  • Re: PatternHandle in record Brian Goetz
  • Re: PatternHandle in record forax
• [sealed] Sealed local classes? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Remi Forax
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Peter Levart
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Remi Forax
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Remi Forax
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Remi Forax
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? Brian Goetz
  • Re: [sealed] Sealed local classes? John Rose
• [records] Native members Brian Goetz
  • Re: [records] Native members Remi Forax
• Record Component attributes Remi Forax
  • Re: Record Component attributes Brian Goetz
  • Re: Record Component attributes forax
  • Re: Record Component attributes Remi Forax
  • Re: Record Component attributes Maurizio Cimadamore
• javax.lang.model for records Vicente Romero
• sealed interface are abstract and final Remi Forax
  • Re: sealed interface are abstract and final Brian Goetz
• Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359 Remi Forax
  • Re: Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359 Brian Goetz
  • Re: Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359 Vicente Romero
  • Re: Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359 forax
• Draft Object Serialization Specification for records Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - serialVersionUID Peter Levart
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - serialVersionUID Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - serialVersionUID Peter Levart
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - serialVersionUID Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - serialVersionUID Peter Levart
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - construction/destruction Peter Levart
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - construction/destruction Peter Levart
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - construction/destruction Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - construction/destruction Peter Levart
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - construction/destruction Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - construction/destruction Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - construction/destruction Peter Levart
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - construction/destruction Chris Hegarty
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - construction/destruction Brian Goetz
  • Re: Draft Object Serialization Specification for records - construction/destruction Chris Hegarty
• JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) Jim Laskey
  • Re: JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) Jim Laskey
  • Re: JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) Jim Laskey
  • Re: JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) Brian Goetz
  • Re: JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) John Rose
  • Re: JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) John Rose
  • Re: JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) Brian Goetz
  • Re: JDK-8227870 - Escape Sequences For Line Continuation and White Space (Preview) John Rose
• Re: New candidate JEP: 361: Switch Expressions (Standard) Gavin Bierman
  • Re: New candidate JEP: 361: Switch Expressions (Standard) Brian Goetz
  • Re: New candidate JEP: 361: Switch Expressions (Standard) Brian Goetz
  • Re: New candidate JEP: 361: Switch Expressions (Standard) Gavin Bierman
  • RE: New candidate JEP: 361: Switch Expressions (Standard) Manoj Palat
  • Re: New candidate JEP: 361: Switch Expressions (Standard) Gavin Bierman
• javadoc support for records and sealed types Jonathan Gibbons
• [records] A link between record component and a getter method Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [records] A link between record component and a getter method Brian Goetz
• [records] A reflection API to get the primary constructor? Tagir Valeev
  • Re: [records] A reflection API to get the primary constructor? Brian Goetz
• record components as a first class reflection element Vicente Romero
  • Re: record components as a first class reflection element Alex Buckley
  • Re: record components as a first class reflection element Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: record components as a first class reflection element Vicente Romero
  • Re: record components as a first class reflection element John Rose
  • Re: record components as a first class reflection element Vicente Romero
  • Re: record components as a first class reflection element Brian Goetz
  • Re: record components as a first class reflection element Remi Forax
  • Re: record components as a first class reflection element Remi Forax
  • Re: record components as a first class reflection element Chris Hegarty
  • Re: record components as a first class reflection element Vicente Romero
• Exploring inference for sealed types Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Exploring inference for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Exploring inference for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Exploring inference for sealed types Remi Forax
  • Re: Exploring inference for sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Exploring inference for sealed types forax
  • Re: Exploring inference for sealed types John Rose

• Earlier messages
• Later messages