Hello, I agree with the sentiment below. While it is not unreasonable for a specialized tool to cost more than the base product (based on amortizing the costs over a smaller user base), there should be a way to test its value. In my case, I have written many overlapping functions to these in AFL. Speed is my issue. I would love to test the functionality against my own versions for speed. I am trying to trade realtime, and I have 2 second compute delays. Speeding up my routines is high on my wish list. It would take some time and effort on my part just to evaluate its usefulness as integrated into my routines. I have already run down the route of purchasing a toolbox that could not be returned, only to discover that it was useless to me after a lot of effort. Insult added to injury that I would not like to repeat. However, I am interested in finding out if it can be of value to me.
Best regards, Dennis On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:58 AM, cjdudek wrote: > Yeah, this looks fairly useful and I don't mind paying for somebody else's > code, but not without a free trial like AmiBroker offered, especially > considering your "no refund" policy. It's really hard to look at > documentation to decide whether or not it's worth $300. I looked at plenty > of AmiBroker alternatives that looked good on their web sites but didn't > offer the functionality of AmiBroker. I think a product like this might make > AmiBroker 10% or 20% more useful, but not 100% more useful, so the price does > not seem to reflect the value. If I had a 30-day or even 10-day free trial I > might change my mind. > > --- In [email protected], ram vel <r...@...> wrote: >> >> Hi wisestocktrader >> Thanks for your info with indepth idea of your toolset. >> CAN YOU PLEASE GIVE US LINK FOR HAVING A TRIAL OF YOUR TOOLBOX,PLEASE > >
