----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Turner"
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:24 AM


: 1) I'm surprised to find .ac in the IANA list,
:    because it's not in ISO 3166, and I thought
:    IANA's stated policy was only to include
:    ISO 3166 names as geographic TLDs.

IANA's policy -- http://www.iana.org/cctld/cctld.htm
-- *does* plainly state: "The codes IANA uses are
two-letter codes from the ISO 3166-1 list." However,
note this passage from a link on the above-referenced
document entitled "describing the relationship between
the ISO 3166-1 list and ccTLDs":

     "So the alpha-2 code elements from ISO 3166-1
      are used in the Internet as the country code
      top-level domain identifiers (ccTLDs). There
      are more than 240 ccTLDs in the Internet. In
      fact ICANN's subsidiary IANA has created a few
      ccTLDs (.ac, .gg, .im, .je and .uk) which are
      not based on official list of country codes but
      on the list of reserved ISO 3166-1 code elements."

ISO 3166-1 is a basis for ccTLD generation. There is a
passing discussion of the above-named exceptions here:
http://www.wwtld.org/mailarchive/cctld-discuss/vol01/msg00268.html

Note also that .eu is lumbering toward eventual approval. ;)


: 2) Of course I'm happy to include .biz, .info etc. as well.
:    Sorry, I should have done that before.

No need to apologize. Here's the list I created for
gTLDs in my working/revised *dom.tab file:

#
#
#############################################
# Generic TLDs - Primary Reference:         #
# http://www.iana.org/gtld/gtld.htm         #
#############################################
aero    2  Air-Transport Industry - Global
biz     2  Businesses - Global
com     2  Commercial - Global
coop    2  Cooperatives - Global
edu     2  US Higher Education
gov     2  US Government
info    2  Informative - Global
int     2  International Treaty Organizations
mil     2  US Military
museum  2  Museums - Global
name    2  Individuals - Global
net     2  Networks - Global
org     2  Non-Profits - Global

I changed the textual descriptions, but that's
the list as I know it now. arpa was excluded
from the above list because it is considered
am "Infrastructual TLD" and so resides in a
distinct section of my *dom.tab file.


: 4) If you have any corrections to the organisation
:    levels, let me know.

I have several. I'll want to sit on them for a few
more days as I work through the subdomain mappings
for each TLD and check my work over ... to where
should I send these?

Should I err on the side of caution (lower) or
potential accuracy (higher) in setting levels --
there are a number of ccTLDs that use a mixed
structure where a given organization could be
identified at level 2 or 3, depending on how
the domain in question was registered?

I guess I can play it by ear -- when I have time
to post the subdomain mappings (not here -- on
the Web) for interested parties, they can check
to see what I'm up against and re-verify my work
where I indicate potential ambiguity. Sound fair?


: Usually I choose the higher number, although
: sometimes (e.g. Canada) I don't, if most of
: the organisations are at the smaller level.

Unfortunately, few TLD registrars openly
provide count statistics per scheme used. :(


: I don't want to put subdomains back in the
: domains file.

That's fine. In thinking thing through later,
I think I'm pretty happy with setting one level
and attempting to live with the results. I also
found that it would kill the way in which I'm
handling SUBDOMAIN directives (including files
based on which TLD I wish to break out into
described levels), as *dom.tab is monolithic
and does not permit arbitrary inclusion.


: I would consider allowing the user to give
: exceptions to the normal organisation levels
: for domains in the configuration file. It's
: not a high priority for me at the moment, but
: if someone writes a patch, I'll consider it
: and probably include it.

That sounds fair. Perhaps I can find time to
take a closer look at the source and provide
a patch myself in the coming year ;) Should
someone else want to think about this, though ...


Thanks for the response. Please let me know
how best to present the changes I think should
be made to organization levels in *dom.tab.

- don

+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
|  mailing list, go to
|    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html
|
|  List archives are available at
|    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
|    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/
|    http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to