On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, d.brodale wrote: > > : 4) If you have any corrections to the organisation > : levels, let me know. > > I have several. I'll want to sit on them for a few > more days as I work through the subdomain mappings > for each TLD and check my work over ... to where > should I send these? >
Great, thanks. Send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], please. Thanks for the gTLDs too. I'll write to my translators and try and get them working on translations for them. > Should I err on the side of caution (lower) or > potential accuracy (higher) in setting levels -- > there are a number of ccTLDs that use a mixed > structure where a given organization could be > identified at level 2 or 3, depending on how > the domain in question was registered? > Usually 3 is better, and the kludge will often make it 2 where necessary. Unless 2 really seems better for a particular case, like Canada. -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01 +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this | mailing list, go to | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | List archives are available at | http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/ | http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7 +------------------------------------------------------------------------
