tis 2002-03-12 klockan 13.20 skrev Stephen Turner: > > Should I err on the side of caution (lower) or > > potential accuracy (higher) in setting levels -- > > there are a number of ccTLDs that use a mixed > > structure where a given organization could be > > identified at level 2 or 3, depending on how > > the domain in question was registered? > > Usually 3 is better, and the kludge will often make it 2 where necessary. > Unless 2 really seems better for a particular case, like Canada.
Sweden (.se) is an example of a mixed 3- and 2-level ccTLD. I'm unsure about the statistics for the use of the three or two levels, but it's unfortunate if the domain detection cannot be made accurate. I can provide a list of the .se semi-domains that indicate a 3-level domain names if that could be useful. Christian +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this | mailing list, go to | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | List archives are available at | http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/ | http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7 +------------------------------------------------------------------------
