On 2/23/09, Sundog <[email protected]> wrote: > The answer can't be "so write a different type of application". > Certainly these are good strategies, but not suited to every kind of > game; seeing that type of game disappear from the market is not a > forward-thinking solution. Some people WANT these simple little games.
If people want the games they will not return them, right? And how hard is it to, I don't know, mirror the normal game board layout occasionally, or vary the number and location of powerups, add some gameplay configuration options, or whatever? Anything to make the gameplay different enough that it's still interesting several days later. I think the return policy has both good and bad aspects, but is mostly a win for everyone but developers wanting money for something lame. But it needs to be paired with a working checkout system, copy protection, etc. which so far Google has failed to provide. Steve -- Yes, Chinese is easy if people speak slowly to you, in proper tones and without an accent. But this is not how Chinese is spoken. -- renzhe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
