On Oct 9, 5:07 am, Mark Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JP wrote:
> > That raises the question: Why not charge the old fashioned way?
>
> Some will. Some will believe that free distribution and an ad-based
> model will work better for them. Some might try both, as somebody else
> on this thread suggested (free-with-ads or upgrade to $$$ premium
> edition that is ad-free).
Well we're sharing opinions - I'm all for keeping it simple: Fair use
based on purchasing a pop. If you can get this into people's heads,
even my grandma will give it a try. On second though, I will cut some
slack if ad revenue does not "show", i.e. is a completely
*transparent* part of the user experience. Putting banner ads, nagware
and other garbage out there will kill a quality experience in seconds
and drive users away.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
