..then if the Mobile user wants the ads, then you can also charge for the the App!
- Juan T. On Oct 9, 10:11 am, jtaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the book "Smart Mobs" mention is made of having Mobile Ads sought > after. Where the user wants the Ads. I think this is possible through > an ADS API, like the Search API where specific apps can model the way > the adsense ads work. > > - Juan > > On Oct 9, 9:28 am, JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 9, 5:07 am, Mark Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > JP wrote: > > > > That raises the question: Why not charge the old fashioned way? > > > > Some will. Some will believe that free distribution and an ad-based > > > model will work better for them. Some might try both, as somebody else > > > on this thread suggested (free-with-ads or upgrade to $$$ premium > > > edition that is ad-free). > > > Well we're sharing opinions - I'm all for keeping it simple: Fair use > > based on purchasing a pop. If you can get this into people's heads, > > even my grandma will give it a try. On second though, I will cut some > > slack if ad revenue does not "show", i.e. is a completely > > *transparent* part of the user experience. Putting banner ads, nagware > > and other garbage out there will kill a quality experience in seconds > > and drive users away. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
