Must admit Google has pushed the developers into a corner with limited G1 availability in US only. SUCKS!
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alternatively instead of just saying "Alpha", the description could say > "Only for users willing to test the application and provide feedback, > not for general usage". > > Putting "Alpha" or "Beta" isn't the only way to describe a products state. > > Al. > > JP wrote: > > > > On Oct 10, 12:17 am, "Muthu Ramadoss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Our plan is to release on Oct 22 with an alpha tag and a disclaimer. But > >> would like to get some testing done on G1 if possible. > >> > > > > When aunt Jeanie and uncle Harold get their G1's, they won't know the > > hell what an Alpha (or Beta, for that matter) release is. To them it > > either works, or not. If it doesn't, they will not have the patience > > to chase down later versions, and toss it out. I suppose I count as an > > advocate for releasing only fully functional apps. When the conduits > > fill up with garbage, it dilutes the platform for everybody. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- take care, Muthu Ramadoss. http://mobeegal.in - mobile search. redefined. +91 98403 48914 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
