mark hensley wrote: > When I spend good money I expectcertain things. I always heartily recommend doing product research before purchasing expensive items.
> I'd rather hhave a phone with less initial features, yet where the > iincluded apps work properly. Your definition of "work properly" may or may not be the same as others' definitions of "work properly". Some people may be satisfied with the basic features of the email client. Others, such as myself, have zero interest in an email client and therefore are content with the email client as-is but might be less happy if other features were pulled to devote more initial engineering effort to the email client. No mobile device -- for that matter, virtually no product -- will have all the features to satisfy all the potential customers all of the time. All else being equal, a better email client beats a worse email client, but all else is rarely equal. Hence, the T-Mobile G1 and Android 1.0 does not satisfy you. We get that. We actually got that a few emails ago. > You guys are trying way to hard to come up with > excuses and justification for such a dismal piece of programming. The replies you ridicule are trying to look forward from where we are today, to determine both how to help those in your position today and what the community can be doing to help more permanently solve this problem. As you point out, we can't exactly be relying on the core Android team for this. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com _The Busy Coder's Guide to Android Development_ Version 1.4 Published! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
