> One last thing that I was just wondering, since when did open source > automatically mean free? I thought it meant that the source code was > open for anyone to use it, amend it or create using it?
The pirates - and by that I mean anyone who thinks it's OK to steal software, music, or movies - decided that Open Source meant THEM. It remains to be seen whether Android will survive this "everything should be free" attitude. Gee, go figure. First pirates kneecap the computer software industry, then they destroy the music industry, then they are hard at work destroying the movie industry, and here we are at Everything Should Be Free, but Everything is Crap. Surprise, surprise! Unless people pull their socks up and finally INDIVIDUALLY REALIZE that when you STEAL EVERYTHING artists stop creating, this won't change. Not until the only music is music made by your neighbor and the only movies are what your friends put on YouTube. Absolutely amazing to me the arrogance with which these do-it-yourself socialists brazenly attack the people who create their software when we make so little right NOW it's not worth the time to write it. Free software is BAD SOFTWARE. You get what you pay for. The freeloaders are getting exactly the quality of crappy software they deserve. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
