My apologies if I seemed a bit "riled up" in that post, I just felt a bit
offended.  So I took up for myself and the other guy.
------------------
http://andrewhays.net
http://ashays.livejournal.com


On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Disconnect <[email protected]> wrote:

> Er, just FYI there is a G2.
> http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=CC31737D-1A64-6A71-CE0746B5AEA1CF75
>
> And it would probably make a decent dev unit. I'd get one.
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Andrew Hays <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Just for clarity, while it's true that all newer models lack a physical
>> keyboard, that doesn't infer inherent inferiority.
>> And yes, while it's true that there's a technical difference between the
>> G1 and the ADP1, I'm sure everyone knows what you're talking about, in the
>> context, if you mention a "G2," instead of calling it the Android Dev Phone
>> 2.  It was quite clear what he was requesting when he asked about developer
>> phones and mentioned a "G2."
>>
>> Finally, I hate to "feed the trolls," but calling people morons for make
>> guesses on something knows about isn't quite the best way to handle it
>> either.
>>
>> Aside from all of that, I agree with you.  The HTC Magic is unlikely to be
>> another developer phone, however, I could see something with the Sense UI
>> like the HTC Hero being another release of the developer phone.  Someone
>> mentioned earlier that the ADP1 was out of stock and they weren't selling
>> any more.  This could indicate that someone is about to release a newer
>> developer phone.  My current plan is to keep my developer phone and allow my
>> fiancée to use it, under the requirements that she let me continue to
>> develop on it, and buy an unlocked HTC Hero, if indeed they don't release an
>> ADP2.  I think that would suit me, well.
>> ------------------
>> http://andrewhays.net
>> http://ashays.livejournal.com
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:35 PM, lbcoder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> That is kind of a stupid question since 1) there is no such thing as a
>>> "g2", 2) there is no such thing as a "g1 developer phone". The only
>>> developer phone running android is "android developer phone 1", which
>>> is an HTC DREAM with an engineering bootloader.
>>>
>>> Now if you are under some moronic assumption that HTC MAGIC is somehow
>>> a "g2" (which is nonsense), I can assure you that NO, HTC MAGIC will
>>> never be a developer phone. It wouldn't make any sense at all since it
>>> is TECHNICALLY INFERIOR to "Android developer phone 1" (it lacks a
>>> physical keyboard). If you want to test things for HTC MAGIC
>>> compatibility with HTC DREAM, simply don't open the keyboard.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 1, 3:31 pm, AG <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Can anybody give me an idea whether android developer phone are going
>>> > to be upgraded to G2 or any such intention??
>>> > If so when?re than it would need to be on any other device. If there is
>>> some route through which the web service can be accessed, then it is fine.
>>> Obviously, if it *can't* be accessed, it isn't going to work.
>>> >
>>> > If someone already has the present G1 developer phone, whether he has
>>> > to buy again G2 or google would replace with the G1 Version.
>>> >
>>> > As per my understanding image upgradation would be supported by google
>>> > for any further advancement so therefore  software upgradation would
>>> > not be a problem ( let me correct if I am wrong) but I was wondering
>>> > about physical improvement.
>>> >
>>> > Please provide/share your information on this regard...
>>> >
>>> > My primary question: when if at all Developer Phone G2 is going to
>>> > launch?
>>> >
>>> > Re,
>>> > AG
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to