Geeze,

This isn't too complicated.
Just because an organization has open source software doesn't mean
that their software is *ALL* open source or freely redistributable.

Inclusion of the closed source google apps in these hacker roms is
PIRACY, plain and simple, and Google *does* have the right to protect
their property.


The simple solution is to just NOT INCLUDE the google apps for which
the rom maker doesn't have a redistribution license.
Is there any particular reason why these roms MUST contain all those
closed source apps? Nope. If a user really wants them, nothing to stop
them from adding them in. As I understand it, htc's license (in
distributing official ADP1 system images with google apps) allows them
to license those google apps for installation to official ADP1 devices
regardless of the source of the overall system image, so owners of
ADP1 devices can LEGALLY use a mod rom and install the closed-source
google apps.


As for Google's motives here, It doesn't appear to be just the
redistribution of their closed source apps. It appears to be more
specifically related to the distribution of the PRERELEASE DONUT
MARKET APPLICATION.

In other words, if this cyanogen character didn't (a) somehow steal
the prerelease donut market app, and (b) include it with cyanogenmod
roms, it is most likely that Google would have simply IGNORED HIM as
has been their (apparent) policy in the past.

On Sep 24, 7:03 pm, schwiz <[email protected]> wrote:
> So everytime I have seen someone ask about apps2sd for android, the
> response has been something along the lines of 'well if you don't like
> the space on the phone modify it yourself if its that easy'  Someone
> takes this to heart and does it for free for thousands of users who
> are already supporting google and you shut them down?  Now we have to
> pick between having space for apps on our phone -OR- not having the
> marketplace on our phone anymore so it doesn't even matter?  I highly
> suggest if you are going to C&D cyanogen to  give users who have PAID
> for a 'powered by google' android device to backup their google apps
> that they paid for.  We have paid for the software we should be
> entitled to use it with any build of android we choose.  Otherwise,
> you might want to try taking user requests a little more seriously.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to