Hi all,
The Unsolicited Synchronization message (as defined in section 5.1 in
draft-ietf-anima-grasp-distribution) is greatly leveraged in this document to
allow the access authentication point to pass IP to Group mapping info to
policy enforcement point.
That would make the information retrieval more efficient compared to request
and reply (sync) mode.
I guess a missing part is to a flag to be added to objective-flag, i.e.
objective-flag = &(
F_DISC: 0 ; valid for discovery
F_NEG: 1 ; valid for negotiation
F_SYNCH: 2 ; valid for synchronization
F_NEG_DRY: 3 ; negotiation is a dry run
F_UNSLC_SYNCH: 4 ; this is a missing line to indicate valid for
unsolicited synchronization
)
Looks like the future grasp objectives would require to consider if they are
valid for unsolicited synchronization or not.
Rgds,
Yizhou
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
