Hi, ANIMAer, It sounds reasonable that GRASP messages can be utilized in such a way. Detailed procedures and relevant interactions should be studied accordingly.
BR/Xun -----Original Message----- From: Liyizhou Sent: Monday, 25 October 2021 11:04 To: [email protected] Cc: Xun Xiao <[email protected]> Subject: unsolicited synchronizaiton in draft-yizhou-anima-ip-to-access-control-groups-01.txt Hi all, The Unsolicited Synchronization message (as defined in section 5.1 in draft-ietf-anima-grasp-distribution) is greatly leveraged in this document to allow the access authentication point to pass IP to Group mapping info to policy enforcement point. That would make the information retrieval more efficient compared to request and reply (sync) mode. I guess a missing part is to a flag to be added to objective-flag, i.e. objective-flag = &( F_DISC: 0 ; valid for discovery F_NEG: 1 ; valid for negotiation F_SYNCH: 2 ; valid for synchronization F_NEG_DRY: 3 ; negotiation is a dry run F_UNSLC_SYNCH: 4 ; this is a missing line to indicate valid for unsolicited synchronization ) Looks like the future grasp objectives would require to consider if they are valid for unsolicited synchronization or not. Rgds, Yizhou _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
