Smith, Ned <ned.sm...@intel.com> wrote:
>> As I mentioned before, the multiple suffixes draft might not
>> land... So it would be better to avoid multiple plus
>> I was following your lead from earlier in the thread.
the advice I got verbally last week was to use as specific a +thing as
possible.
So +cwt is better than +cose+cbor, even though +cose+cbor is a superset of
+cwt. (Every CWT is a COSE object)
I'm not even sure that +cose+cbor ever makes sense, since +cose implies +cbor.
But, +cose+gzip might make sense in some context.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
