On 4 April 2011 15:27, Roman Zegarski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In attachment there is first version of my application.  I hope I
> included all things mentioned earlier about this project.  What do You
> think about it?

Nice proposal.

One thing that's missing is that, because the DBPedia framework
extracts RDF, you will need to give some thought to the ontology that
will be used. For most of the parts of Wiktionary that are directly
useful to Apertium, you should use the Gold ontology
(http://linguistics-ontology.org/), though there may be other data in
Wiktionary for which new ontological properties (and thus a new
ontology) may need to be defined. You should consider that during the
community bonding period.

'Work on creating interface for DBPedia allowing user to retrieve data
in language neutral way (as far
as it is possible)'

I think the existing DBPedia method of using a wiki to define
extraction templates is the most natural interface, given its nature,
so you should perhaps stick to that. Instead, you could use this time
to develop extraction 'templates' for the most frequently used
templates on en.wiktionary (and perhaps one other, of your choice),
which can then be used for testing.

The same goes for the contents of weeks 5-9. Developing the extraction
will, I think, take longer than you have planned for, but the extra
interface is not necessary, while testing and extraction of
dictionaries should be concurrent to development.

-- 
<Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil.
<Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; 
WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and 
publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to