On 1 November 2011 11:53, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, Tradubi is AGPL (ScaleMT as well), so it's FOSS, but a > controversial license (the gist of it is that changes you make have to > be contributed back _even if you're just running the software as a web > service_).
Not 'contributed back'. The GPL requires that if you distribute binaries, you must provide the _recipients_ with either the source for those binaries, or a written offer to do so. Licences that require that you 'contribute back' typically do not qualify as either free or open source. (If you'll recall, this was the point on EchoNest's data release that dampened my enthusiasm :) -- <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around? <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA® Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
