El 05/02/14 09:09, Mikel Artetxe ha escrit: > I'm not the one who has to take this decision, but doing it just > because stupid Apple doesn't want us to use GPL doesn't sound like a > strong enough reason for me. I mean, I insist that it's not me who has > to take the decision of what license to use, but neither Apple, right? Just to make it clear, our policy, as I understand it, is (1) as a general rule all code derived from Apertium code or endorsed in some way by the Apertium project has to be free/open-source and ideally GPL (2) all software released from Apertium through stores should have a cost of €0,00 (as is the case of Apertium for Android) and clear information on how to get the sources
And then a personal opinion: I am fine with someone working on a free/open-source iOS application for Apertium, but I'd rather support open or "open-sourcey" systems such as Android or Mozilla OS or Ubuntu OS than supporting I-am-proud-of-being-proprietary platfroms such as "wind-oze" or "eye-oze". Mikel -- Mikel L. Forcada (http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/) Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics Universitat d'Alacant E-03071 Alacant, Spain Phone: +34 96 590 9776 Fax: +34 96 590 9326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
