At least to me, it seems unfair that some contributors should be excluded.

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:57 AM Scoop Gracie <scoopgra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Because now, many contributions come through pull requests. Those
> definitions exclude any contributors who do not have write access, even if
> they have contributed significantly to Apertium.
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:55 AM Mikel L. Forcada <m...@dlsi.ua.es> wrote:
>
>> Why is it SF-related? It talks about the project's source repositories,
>> without reference to SF.
>>
>> Mikel
>>
>> El 26/2/20 a les 17:49, Scoop Gracie ha escrit:
>> > That is an outdated, SF-based definition. Shouldn't developers who
>> > have submitted PRs be equally eligible?
>>
>> --
>> Mikel L. Forcada  http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/
>> Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes InformĂ tics
>> Universitat d'Alacant
>> E-03690 Sant Vicent del Raspeig
>> Spain
>> Office: +34 96 590 9776
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to