I might be wrong, but I understood that pull requests are the way in
which casual developers contribute. If a developer contributes through
PRs in a sustained way, they should be named committers.
Mikel
El 26/2/20 a les 17:57, Scoop Gracie ha escrit:
Because now, many contributions come through pull requests. Those
definitions exclude any contributors who do not have write access,
even if they have contributed significantly to Apertium.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:55 AM Mikel L. Forcada <m...@dlsi.ua.es
<mailto:m...@dlsi.ua.es>> wrote:
Why is it SF-related? It talks about the project's source
repositories,
without reference to SF.
Mikel
El 26/2/20 a les 17:49, Scoop Gracie ha escrit:
> That is an outdated, SF-based definition. Shouldn't developers who
> have submitted PRs be equally eligible?
--
Mikel L. Forcada http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/
Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics
Universitat d'Alacant
E-03690 Sant Vicent del Raspeig
Spain
Office: +34 96 590 9776
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
--
Mikel L. Forcada http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/
Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics
Universitat d'Alacant
E-03690 Sant Vicent del Raspeig
Spain
Office: +34 96 590 9776
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
