Does this have something to do with the language barriers for all languages on the online translator?
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 1:03 PM Marc Riera Irigoyen < marc.riera.irigo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been able to reproduce the loop and fix it. It was mainly due to an > unexpected pattern in the testvoc script, but there was also a typo in the > bidix that contributed to the problem. > > 1. The testvoc script did not account for bidix entries with empty > translations and would add extra slashes in many cases. These are used to > test multiple translations for a single entry, which is done by an awk > script in a while loop that could not be escaped. I have fixed the issue > with the extra slashes and changed the while loop to a for limited to 50 > iterations. This should be enough for any pair and the loop includes a > condition to escape it before the 50 iterations, so there is no extra > unnecessary processing. I'll post a pull request directly to the repo with > the fixes shortly. > 2. There is an entry in the bidix (and probably Arpitan monodix as well, > because it generates properly), "Salinas de Gotari", with a line break > after the last tag. It looks like a typo. This typo appears to be valid in > Apertium format but the testvoc script assumes an entry per line and the > double slashes occurred here too. Thanks to the loop limit, testvoc doesn't > get blocked anymore by this entry (and it doesn't appear in the list of > errors, because it generates properly), but it should be fixed. > > Regards, > > *Marc Riera* > > > Missatge de Marc Riera Irigoyen <marc.riera.irigo...@gmail.com> del dia > ds., 15 d’ag. 2020 a les 11:53: > >> Hello Hèctor, >> >> I see that the testvoc script you're using is the one I developed based >> on previous scripts used in several pairs. It shouldn't be producing a loop >> and have never found it before. Given that it's happening only when >> translating from Arpitan to French, I guess there may be something that I >> didn't account for when developing the script. I'll take a look and try to >> recreate it. >> >> Regards, >> >> *Marc Riera* >> >> >> Missatge de Hèctor Alòs i Font <hectora...@gmail.com> del dia ds., 15 >> d’ag. 2020 a les 10:46: >> >>> I am experiencing a very strange behaviour in the fra-frp testvoc. While >>> there is not any problem in the frp2fra side (the test is finished in less >>> than 30 minutes in my computer), in the fra2frp there is a kind of >>> infinitive loop. The same fine is again and again created and deleted and >>> the tesvoc does not end even waiting during more than 24 hours. The file >>> which is deleted and created again and again (always with the same name) >>> has exactly the same content. The first lines are: >>> >>> >>> [\^frère<adj><m><sg>$]^frère<adj><m><sg>/~/frâre<adj><m><sg>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^frère<adj><m><pl>$]^frère<adj><m><pl>/~/frâre<adj><m><pl>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^frère<adj><f><sg>$]^frère<adj><f><sg>/~/frâre<adj><f><sg>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^frère<adj><f><pl>$]^frère<adj><f><pl>/~/frâre<adj><f><pl>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^frère<adj><f><sg>$]^frère<adj><f><sg>/~/frâre<adj><f><sg>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^frère<adj><f><pl>$]^frère<adj><f><pl>/~/frâre<adj><f><pl>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^frère<adj><m><sg>$]^frère<adj><m><sg>/~/frâre<adj><m><sg>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^frère<adj><m><pl>$]^frère<adj><m><pl>/~/frâre<adj><m><pl>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^frère<adj><f><sg>$]^frère<adj><f><sg>/~/frâre<adj><f><sg>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^frère<adj><f><pl>$]^frère<adj><f><pl>/~/frâre<adj><f><pl>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^1er<adj><f><pl>$]^1er<adj><f><pl>/~/1ér<adj><ord><f><pl>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^1er<adj><f><sg>$]^1er<adj><f><sg>/~/1ér<adj><ord><f><sg>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^1er<adj><m><pl>$]^1er<adj><m><pl>/~/1ér<adj><ord><m><pl>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^1er<adj><m><sg>$]^1er<adj><m><sg>/~/1ér<adj><ord><m><sg>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^abattu<adj><f><pl>$]^abattu<adj><f><pl>/~/abatu<adj><f><pl>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^abattu<adj><f><pl>$]^abattu<adj><f><pl>/~/dèfêt<adj><f><pl>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^abattu<adj><f><pl>$]^abattu<adj><f><pl>/~/dèchesu<adj><f><pl>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> [\^abattu<adj><f><sg>$]^abattu<adj><f><sg>/~/abatu<adj><f><sg>$+^.<sent>/~/.<sent>$ >>> >>> I have never seen such a thing before and I cannot imagine what can >>> cause this behaviour. Any ideas? >>> >>> Hèctor >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Apertium-stuff mailing list >>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >>> >> _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
