All, John Curran, ARIN CEO, just shared next step on arin-ppml mailing list, and let me share it as I could not find better source. (Sorry, I don't have any intension to quote it)
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2014-March/028006.html And, we need to reply feedback before "Mar 27th, 2014" which means this THURSDAY!! However, I have not yet understood what we need to give a feedback for. Does somebody know it? http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/iana/functions-transfer-process-14m ar14-en.pdf My first comment for this is "It's too urgent. ICANN should not push other internet orgs to do anything." Rgs, Masato Yamanishi On 14/03/22 20:16, "Tony Smith" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Naresh > > Sorry, to answer your earlier question about "plans" - the plan is something > that APNIC, our community, and all interested Internet users worldwide have > been prompted to contribute to as per the NTIA announcement (which asked ICANN > to facilitate). > > Paul's email from Friday (available here: > http://www.apnic.net/publications/news/2014/iana-globalization-consultation-pr > ocess) explained the next steps. > > Everyone - including the Secretariat! - is hoping to find out more at ICANN 49 > in Singapore. We hope there will be discussion at the meeting on how this > process is going to work and the community will have some input into the > mechanics of the consultation process. ICANN changed the program just today > with an updated time for its discussion session - it is now at 10.30am SG time > on Monday: > http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-globalization-advisory > > As Paul's email said, the APNIC EC is currently considering the best ways to > facilitate discussions and capture input from the Asia Pacific community. It > would be great to hear your and other Members' views on how the APNIC > community can contribute to this process. > > Kind regards > Tony > > From: Naresh Ajwani <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, 23 March 2014 10:19 am > To: MAEMURA Akinori <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] IANA Globalization Progress > > Maemura, hi > > Masato; Do you mean that DG had signed it before consulting EC nor members as >> > there was not enough time? >> > Does it comply with APNIC by-laws 54? It says; > Maemura; "I am sure he has been in full touch with the EC to proceed these > issues and signed them under the EC's authorization." > > Is it part of any Munute of Meeting or mails and if in public domain? > > Transparency wud help more. I am still waiting for the plans if any, I had > asked for in this thread mails > > Regards & best wishes > > Naresh Ajwani > > On 23 Mar 2014 06:37, "MAEMURA Akinori" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Masato, >> >> >> (2014/03/21 11:18), Masato Yamanishi wrote: >>> > Maemura-san and EC members, >>> > >>> > Thank you for sharing EC's view. >>> > Let me quote your statement in slightly different order to make my >>> comment. >>> > >>>> >> Technically speaking on the basis of our governing provisions, >>>> >> the Executive Council has function to act on behalf of the Members >>>> >> in the interval between AGMs, and to manage the activities, functions >>>> >> and affairs of APNIC. >>>> >> >>>> >> More practically, the EC represents the Membership to manage APNIC's >>>> >> activity, >>>> >> and need to comply the will of the Membership, sometimes with the >>>> >> broader community. >>>> >> >>>> >> We have the power to authorise the activity by DG and Secretariat for >>>> >> the Membership, >>>> >> but need to synchronise our thought on the authorization with the >>>> >> Membership. >>>> >> >>>> >> That is why we set a timeslot to discuss the Internet Governance issue >>>> >> in the AMM this time, >>>> >> after we announced our support for Montevideo Statement in January. >>> > >>> > It complies with APNIC by-laws 30, so I don't see any problem from >>> > procedure perspective. >> Yes, as you see the wording in my message was in accordance with it. >> >>> > BUT, >>> > >>>> >> Montevideo Statement was crafted among the I* CEOs in the situation, as >>>> >> Tony has already told, >>>> >> with very limited time allowance with very quick moves at that time, >>>> >> and so was the I*'s reaction to NTIA statement. >>> > >>> > >>> > Do you mean that DG had signed it before consulting EC nor members as >>> > there was not enough time? >>> > Does it comply with APNIC by-laws 54? It says; >> I am sure he has been in full touch with the EC to proceed these issues and >> signed them under the EC's authorization. >> >> Akinori >>> > 54. The main functions of the Director General are: >>> > a. to act as the chief executive officer of APNIC and the corporation; >>> > b. to have, subject to the provisions of these by-laws and to the >>> > direction of the Executive Council, the responsibility for the general >>> > management and control of the activities, functions and affairs of APNIC >>> > and the corporation and shall perform all duties and have all powers which >>> > are commonly incident to the office of chief executive or which are >>> > delegated by the Executive Council; >>> > c. to execute all contracts, agreements and other instruments of the >>> > corporation which are authorised including affixing the Seal of the >>> > corporation; >>> > d. to appoint and have general supervision and direction of all of the >>> > other staff and agents of APNIC and the corporation, including but not >>> > limited to bookkeeping, accounting and treasury functions on behalf of the >>> > Treasurer; >>> > e. to implement strategic policies, prepare plans for APNIC, and shall >>> > coordinate its activities, functions and affairs; >>> > f. to report to the Executive Council and to put forward resolutions for >>> > the consideration of the Executive Council; >>> > g. to take all the actions required to ensure the economic use of >>> > APNIC's resources and shall be responsible to the Executive Council for >>> > all the administrative and financial aspects of APNIC's activities; >>> > h. to act as the legal representative of APNIC and the corporation; >>> > i. to act as an ex-officio member of the Executive Council. >>> > >>> > >>> > Rgs, >>> > Masato Yamanishi >>> > >>> > >>> > On 14/03/19 0:12, "MAEMURA Akinori" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>> >> Dear Masato, Pranesh and everyone, >>>> >> >>>> >> I know this is very late response for your request for the EC to >>>> clarify. >>>> >> Apologies. >>>> >> >>>> >> At Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:41:35 -0700 >>>> >> In message <cf4cc73d.85d7d%[email protected] >>>> <mailto:cf4cc73d.85d7d%[email protected]> > >>>> >> "Re: [apnic-talk] IANA Globalization Progress" >>>> >> "Masato Yamanishi <[email protected]>" wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> | Pranesh and All, >>>> >> | >>>> >> | While I'm not new to APNIC, I have same question/concern. >>>> >> | Can EC clarify it? >>>> >> | >>>> >> >>>> >> Montevideo Statement was crafted among the I* CEOs in the situation, as >>>> >> Tony has already told, with very limited time allowance with very quick >>>> >> moves at that time, and so was the I*'s reaction to NTIA statement. >>>> >> >>>> >> Technically speaking on the basis of our governing provisions, the >>>> >> Executive Council has function to act on behalf of the Members in the >>>> >> interval between AGMs, and to manage the activities, functions and >>>> >> affairs of APNIC. >>>> >> >>>> >> More practically, the EC represents the Membership to manage APNIC's >>>> >> activity, and need to comply the will of the Membership, sometimes with >>>> >> the broader community. >>>> >> >>>> >> We have the power to authorise the activity by DG and Secretariat for >>>> the >>>> >> Membership, but need to synchronise our thought on the authorization >>>> with >>>> >> the Membership. >>>> >> >>>> >> That is why we set a timeslot to discuss the Internet Governance issue in >>>> >> the AMM this time, after we announced our support for Montevideo >>>> >> Statement in January. >>>> >> >>>> >> It was great to see very active discussion there, and that it triggered >>>> >> the continued discussion on line. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> As Masato points out, now Paul is more engaged in the activity of >>>> >> coordination among our fellow organizations and ITU arena, which is >>>> based >>>> >> on the EC's authorization. We authorize becuase we think it needed. >>>> >> >>>> >> I understand it looks like politics game with little thing, if not >>>> >> nothing, to do with Members' own business. >>>> >> >>>> >> However from the viewpoint of a company whose business is serving >>>> >> community with Internet Resource, one of which is APNIC, it is really >>>> >> important to address the risk of unwanted non-viable arrangement and to >>>> >> have people with other stakes understand our position. >>>> >> >>>> >> Moreover, as already mentioned, the forthcoming couple of years are >>>> quite >>>> >> crucial stage for us to keep our healthy business environment. >>>> >> >>>> >> That's why we authorize these activities by Secretariat, and what we >>>> need >>>> >> to have you understand. >>>> >> >>>> >> As we have many things to come, Director General and the EC will have >>>> >> more communication each other to consider these actions, than we have >>>> >> already been doing. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> I know, through my own business, that how Internet Governance issues are >>>> >> difficult for people (e.g. of tech community) to realize, I am still on >>>> >> the way to find how I can couple the issue we confront adequately with >>>> >> community's interest. >>>> >> >>>> >> The EC needs to have the Membership's support with well-informed >>>> consent, >>>> >> and of course we need to change our thought just in case we found it was >>>> >> not of the Membership and community, and I hope the current discussion >>>> >> will valuable for the purpose. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Sincerely, >>>> >> >>>> >> MAEMURA Akinori, my own hat on, but I am sure the EC well sheres these >>>> >> points >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> | Rgs, >>>> >> | Masato Yamanishi >>>> >> | >>>> >> | >>>> >> | >>>> >> | On 14/03/14 23:01, "Pranesh Prakash" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> | >>>> >> | >Tony Smith [2014-03-14 21:42]: >>>> >> | >> As I'm sure you appreciate, the news from the US has just arrived >>>> >> this >>>> >> | >>morning and a lot of the details are still coming to light. We're >>>> >> | >>planning to prepare something that explains what this development >>>> >> means >>>> >> | >>in more detail when more information is confirmed. >>>> >> | > >>>> >> | >I'm sorry, but I'm new to APNIC's lists. >>>> >> | > >>>> >> | >Was there any consultation within APNIC before APNIC's leader's name >>>> >> was >>>> >> | >added to this statement? Could you also point me towards the >>>> community >>>> >> | >consultation / mailing list discussions that took place before the >>>> >> | >Montevideo Declaration was signed as something APNIC endorsed? >>>> >> | > >>>> >> | >> But for now, we wanted to alert everyone to this news and the fact >>>> >> | >>consultation will begin in our region in Singapore. >>>> >> | > >>>> >> | >Could you outline the intra-APNIC consultations (i.e., not the ICANN >>>> >> | >consultations about which ICANN's published a document) that will >>>> take >>>> >> | >place with regard to this? Which mailing list will these discussions >>>> >> be >>>> >> | >directed towards? >>>> >> | > >>>> >> | >-- >>>> >> | >Pranesh Prakash >>>> >> | >Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society >>>> >> | >T: +91 80 40926283 <tel:%2B91%2080%2040926283> | W: >>>> http://cis-india.org >>>> >> | >------------------- >>>> >> | >Access to Knowledge Fellow, Information Society Project, Yale Law >>>> >> School >>>> >> | >M: +1 520 314 7147 <tel:%2B1%20520%20314%207147> | W: >>>> http://yaleisp.org >>>> >> | >PGP ID: 0x1D5C5F07 | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pranesh_prakash >>>> >> | > >>>> >> | >>>> >> | >>>> >> | _______________________________________________ >>>> >> | apnic-talk mailing list >>>> >> | [email protected] >>>> >> | http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk >>>> >> | >>> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> apnic-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk > _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
_______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
