I support an increased level of financial reporting, but only to the extent that itself doesn't cause extra burden and cost on APNIC.
...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks Company [email protected] ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Dean Pemberton <[email protected]>wrote: > I agree with Yamanishi-san. > > The document detailing the activities undertaken by APNIC at the > ICANN49 meeting are an excellent first step to articulating to > membership what the purpose and benefits are of this level of > engagement. > > As previously mentioned, I don't believe that the root of the issue is > business class travel or otherwise, I believe that it is demonstrating > to the membership, in a way that they accept, that the balance between > the expenditure and outcomes is appropriate. > > In order to do that, there must be transparency and a level of > detailed reporting across both areas. It is only then that the > membership can determine if they find the balance appropriate. > > To that end I would support an increased level of financial and > activity reporting along the lines Yamanishi-san has suggested. We do > see this increased reporting in RIRs and other multistakeholder > organisations and they are to be commended for this. > This will allow the membership to determine if outputs such as those > reported by APNIC at ICANN49 are balanced with the expenditure > required to produce them. > > With regard to NetMundial, the final output document is out for > comment, so I would expect a detailed assessment by members of the > APNIC delegation would be presented any time now. > > My favourate part of the document so far is: > > "Internet governance discussions would benefit from improved > communication and coordination between technical and non-technical > communities, providing a better understanding about the policy > implications in technical decisions and technical implications in > policy decision making." > > Ensuring that Internet Governance messages are reframed and > communicated in a way that the technical community finds easy to > access and engage with seems like something that APNIC is well placed > to do. > > > Regards > > -- > Dean Pemberton > > Technical Policy Advisor > InternetNZ > +64 21 920 363 (mob) > [email protected] > > To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Masato Yamanishi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Paul and Tony, > > > > BTW, I think this page is more transparent than past APNIC announcement. > > > > http://www.apnic.net/publications/news/2014/icann-49-event-wrapup > > > > So, can we expect similar announcement about NETmundial in last week? > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > Rgs, > > Masato Yamanishi > > > > > > On 14/04/26 0:44, "Dave Mead" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Paul, > > > > Your speech at Asia Pacific Internet Leadership Program meeting is > utterly > > disappointing to APNIC Members. > > > > http://www.apnic.net/publications/news/2014/icann-49-event-wrapup > > > > You said, "...Members pay fees to APNIC to support the organisation and > the > > services and they don't give APNIC a blessing to spend that money in > > unlimited fashion on Internet development..." > > > > http://audio.icann.org/meetings/singapore2014/apilp-22mar14-en.mp3 > > > > Members DID NOT BLESS APNIC to spend the fees on business class travel > which > > costs 3 times more than an economy class ticket. The entire senior > > management, including your Executve Assistant and those who work for > APNIC > > as consultants travel in business class contributing to the success of > the > > airlines but clearly not Internet development in this region. > > > > http://www.apnic.net/about-APNIC/team > > > > Paul, you're leading a not-for-profit organisation not a comerncial > entity > > that you and your senior management can erode member funds for your > > comfortable travels across the world. This is just outrageous and > > mismanagement of Member funds. > > > > Members like to see the Executive Council takes note of this and truely > > represent the Members to better manage their funds to contribute for the > > Internet development in this region. A lot of development work can be > done > > if the funds are managed effectively not use for personal benefits. > > > > Best > > -Dave Mead > > > > _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > apnic-talk mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk > > > _______________________________________________ > apnic-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk >
_______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
